When I recently was writing about the new national curriculum in History, I came across a rather interesting disagreement with regards to indigenous history in the media, where totally opposing views were equally portrayed. Historians like Keith Windschuttle were claiming a less cruel and intent behaviour towards the indigenous population in the past, backing up his arguments with various details and data and another acclaimed historian, Robert Manne who was opposing Windschuttle’s views with equally researched material to mention one such public disagreement. These diverse and opposing interpretations of Australian history mainstreamed through media and the web can be both confusing and uncomfortable, and it brings me to the discussion we had this week about the importance of critical literacy when dealing with information on the net and how difficult it sometimes can be to make a judgement on the facts without substantial background knowledge. Naturally, few primary school children will drag through any of these historians' research papers or articles, but it highlights an issue. Moving away from the obvious misleading hoax on the web, we can still get such diverse information presented as facts, from reputable authors, from reputable publications or web pages. You clearly have to monitor, prepare the students, and do the homework before asking students to do their research on the web.
Wikipedia and Kevin R. D. Shepherd
-
Education and the Internet — Part 2 Contents Introduction The Holotropic
Breathwork Issue The Sathya Sai Baba Issue Beyond Wikipedia Ethical Issues
on Wiki...
9 years ago